Bear, wolf, dolphin, tiger, gorilla, lion – a completely different chronotype-definition comes from America, that we address here at least once and with the classic chronotypes owl, dove and lark. Michael J. Breus, Ph.D., is a clinical psychologist and a member of both the American Board of Sleep Medicine and the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. According to his website has named him the Top Sleep Specialist in California by Reader’s Digest. His sleep test recently went viral and promises better sleep once you identify your chronotype. In order to actually improve your sleep, however, you have to buy his book. What are the differences to owls and larks?
Unlike the known chronotypes, his scheme includes other members of the animal world. Here we find the lion, the bear, the dolphin and the wolf. There are now apps that use other chronotypes, such as headway_app (a tiger and a gorilla are added here). But what makes the difference between the above-mentioned animals and the owls and larks? The main difference is that the chronotypes according to Breus do not describe a genetic imprint of the temporal position of the sleep/wake rhythm, but the classification is purely behavior-based. First comes the definition and then our critique of it.
Breus defines the chronotypes as follows[1]freely translated from English from several sources: https://thesleepdoctor.com/media/, https://www.sleepadvisor.org/chronotypes/, … Continue reading:
Dolphins typically awaken from sleep restless, have trouble napping and are often tired throughout the day, with an energy boost in the evening. They belong to notable exponents such as Charles Dickens and Williams Shakespeare. This chronotype was named after the mammals that only sleep with half their brains at a time. Breus used this animal to represent the 10% of people who struggle with insomnia and other sleep disorders. While abnormally asleep, dolphins are typically intelligent, motivated individuals who make good friends with strong loyalty.
About 15% of the population are lions and therefore early risers and hunters. They are the COOs[2]Chief Operating Officer Type A, managers and drill sergeants who wake up, train, and coordinate the day’s projects before the rest of the world has had their coffee. Leos lack vision and creativity. They wake up early with a lot of energy and are at their sharpest in the morning. They are often organized leaders, such as Benjamin Franklin. They are also the only chronotype that Breus says has high life satisfaction. These are the leaders who get things done without getting distracted. Analytical and organized, these people prioritize their health and work hard. They usually have the ideal conditions for normal societal expectations.
Bears are the most common chronotype, accounting for 50-55% of the population. In the chronobiological spectrum they are in the middle – no early risers and no night owls. Like true bears, they tend to rise and sleep with the sun, which is in line with the sun’s cycle, although it can take longer for them to get going in the morning. You’re in the same camp with Stephen King and Jeff Bezos. Playful and loving, these people generally lead healthy lifestyles, are good students and team players. The “normal working hours” suit bears, and they’re usually the people who get things done.
Wolves make up 15% of the population. They are the night owls who stand guard like sentries during the rest of their sleep. Typically they are creative types including authors, artists, entrepreneurs, security guards, security guards, musicians, bartenders and many are introverts. They are most active in the early evening hours and are out of sync with the rest of the world. People like Barack Obama and Elon Musk fit this pattern. If you are somewhat nocturnal, your energy levels are usually highest later in the day or early evening. These people tend to be fearless, insightful, intuitive, but just out of sync with most of the world.
This information reflects the definition of the cited sources.
Our criticism of this classification is divided.
Breus also addresses the classic chronotypes in his publications, but mainly propagates his own 4 chronotypes. According to our research, he does not solve this dilemma, but presents it as a logical consequence. However, the problem with a behavior-based classification is evident in the “chicken/egg” issue. Is the cause of the behavior presented above actually in the respective genetic chronotype based on the DLMO or is it a reaction to the individual development of the respective person within his or her social environment (family, job, friends, culture etc.) in which he or we all are embedded. For example, many people like to think of themselves as a chronotype that is socially recognized. That’s why they accept a life that actually runs completely against their inner clock. The result: a lion in terms of behavior, a normal type in terms of genes. Who likes to call himselve a bear when society is looking for lions? The danger of such a behavior-based classification is also the promotion of stigmatization. Entrepreneurs will love lions and avoid bears. A bear may only be tired because society´s clock is going against its natural rhythm.
It seems paradoxical. Breus is also essentially about sleep, but nowhere within the definitions of his chronotypes does he mention the natural sleep-wake cycle. He generally recommends that bears go to bed at 11 p.m. and get up at 7 a.m. For many normal types, however, this means the use of an alarm clock. It is even more extreme with the dolphins. Despite the sleep disturbances presented for this group, he recommends getting up at 6 a.m. and going to bed at 10 p.m. This is completely independent of whether it is even possible due to their genetic predisposition. Especially in people with sleep disorders, this can lead to taking medication or, at best, dietary supplements or melatonin. Even more intensive sport directly after getting up with the alarm clock puts a strain on the body to which it may not yet be prepared at this point. In essence, it is not really about understanding the biological sleep window, acting accordingly and learning to deal with it, but rather taking a certain, presumably chronotype-specific behavior as the basis for daily planning.
We also consider the occupational grouping to be problematic. A night watchman designated as a wolf may be a night watchman only because he is better paid there or cannot get a job otherwise. There are also authors, entrepreneurs or musicians who are definitely not wolves. Behavior-based categories are rather counterproductive when it comes to sleep, as they try to facilitate or even support the user’s behavior instead of first questioning the cause of the behavior.
Cultures also play a significant role in outward behavior. Asians, for example, show completely different behavioral patterns than African or European cultures. Europe alone, wandering from north to south, is permeated by a multitude of cultural and social behavioral patterns that by no means have their cause in a genetic predisposition.
Breu’s behavior-based subdivision of chronotypes lacks, on the one hand, a scientifically validated basis that could stand up to global validity in terms of causal relationship with the classical chronotypes. In addition, the danger of stigmatization is great, since the current social situation already portrays the early types as “positive”. If we had a social order that does not follow a fixed temporal order, this would certainly also neatly mix up the current assignment of people to Dr. Breus’ chronotypes. Finally, however, we see the danger above all in the fact that people do not deal with their behavior, but regard it as unchangeable or even socially desired. Compared to height, this would mean that wearing stiletto heels is encouraged just to keep people from appearing small. Breus’ classification is as like when I classify people by the shoe they wear, rather than their actual height. The aim of any improvement should be to first deal with one’s own biological, unchangeable circumstances in order to improve sleep.
The current, scientific classification by the DLMO, without direct assignment of a behavior necessarily associated with the particular chronotype, can be clearly shown genetically and by blood test or hair root test. The focus should therefore be on putting sleep at the center and not on a behavior that is supposedly evident from a chronotype or even a occupational group. This is of little help to the sleep seeker.
Zu allen Themen bietet Michael Wieden (aliamos GmbH) Vorträge an. Einen Überblick finden Sie hier. | Sie wollen Feedbacks zu den Vorträgen sehen? Die haben wir hier. | Abonnieren Sie den aliamos Newsletter |
---|
Photo sources:
Lion: Kevin Pluck, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons
Wolf: Mas3cf, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons
Bear: Jean-noël Lafargue, FAL, via Wikimedia Commons
Dolphin: NASA, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Michael Wieden beschäftigt sich als Betriebswirt seit 2002 mit der Chronobiologie im Personalmanagement. Schon 2003 hielt er hierzu seinen ersten Vortrag auf einer Veranstaltung der INQA (Initiative der neuen Arbeit).
Zu den Themen „Chronobiologie im Personalmanagenement“ sowie mobilen Arbeitsformen hat er bereits Bücher geschrieben, und dabei den Begriff „Liquid Work®“ geprägt.
Zusammen mit Claudia Garrido Luque gründete er 2014 die aliamos GmbH und berät seit dem Kommunen, Unternehmen und Kliniken zum Betrieblichen Gesundheitsmanagement. Von 2012 bis Ende 2016 war er externer Wirtschaftsförderer für die Stadt Bad Kissingen und Initiator des weltweit einzigartigen Projektes „ChronoCity – Pilotstadt Chronobiologie“. Zu ChronoCity®, Chronobiologie-Themen und mobilen Arbeitsformen trat er wiederholt als Experte in verschiedenen Fernsehformaten (z.B. TerraX, Planet Wissen, W wie Wissen, Xenius etc.) auf. Zudem war er von 2014 bis 2017 Mitglied des Arbeitskreises „Zeitgerechte Stadt“ der ARL – Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung in Hannover.
Aktuell hält er Vorträge zum Thema “Chronobiologie im Personalmanagement” und “Mobile Arbeitsformen”, und berät Unternehmen bei der Umsetzung chronobiologischer Ansätze in Unternehmen und Kliniken.
References
↑1 | freely translated from English from several sources: https://thesleepdoctor.com/media/, https://www.sleepadvisor.org/chronotypes/, https://brightside.me/inspiration-psychology/heres-the-perfect-daily-schedule-that-corresponds-to-your-chronotype-506010/ |
---|---|
↑2 | Chief Operating Officer |
The chronotype is not learned, but follows a genetic predisposition. As a result, we cannot…
Sleep disorders & Covid-19 Can severe Covid disease lead to sleep disorders? This now appears…
Optimal sleep duration is a favorite topic of science. Scientists from the Institute of Science…
The aim of this study was to find out the optimal duration of sleep. What…
Many studies are based around a recommended sleep duration. They all have one thin in…
Innovation in shift planning - At the beginning there was a lecture by me (Michael…